Agree that max reverse would probably not have helped them to stop.
However, this widespread encouragement of idle reverse in the name of fuel saving and the optimum heating of carbon brakes with one hard application is producing unintended consequences.
Unlike on older Aircraft where we trained to use the all stopping devices to their maximum potential as routine the 'relegation' of reverse thrust to a minor role can lead to an underestimation of it's importance when needed.
I have had to very assertively 'encourage' a few Pilots to get max reverse stuck in early when it's most effective on short / wet runways when it's really needed.
This is even after briefing the requirement prior to the approach. Can't blame them because it has ceased to be part of the normal 'muscle memory'
I do blame the 'negative training' that emphasises saving a few pounds of fuel and 'proper carbon brake heating' or even encouraging the irrational idea that you will 'damage the engines' by using more than idle reverse.
Sometimes 'moving forward' is a step back..
Last edited by stilton; 9th Jan 2010 at 05:48.