Beagle
With respect, you have given your opinion of what you think ought to happen.
BOAC
I should perhaps have made things clearer by saying "RAF legal procedures" sooner than law. You suggest that it is generally accepted that the crew may have been responsible and that any new verdict might reflect that possibility.
My query was really about what alternative verdicts are possible given that a successful review might not completely exonerate the crew. A very difficult question, but would a new verdict of any level that did not completely exonerate the crew be acceptable to the Campaign leaders. Perhaps Brian Dixon could comment.