As with more progressive airlines, the first sim each year should be the PC (and the PC should be conducted only once per year).
This should be the basic level of competence that we should be able to achieve 365 x 24/7 - we owe this to our customers. We may need some extra practice to achieve this - due to lack of sectors and the fact that ac are very reliable - and perhaps the tests should always be conducted on how we would fly the ac if things started to go wrong i.e using the automatics. Any report generated from the PC should merely state "pass" (if it was passed to the required standard - with or without repeats) or "refresher training required" (if outside the standard). There should be no numerical grading - it is too subjective and achieves nothing.
For those that required refresher training and a retest, then that should be provided. The other 3 simulator details per year should concentrate on manual flying refresher training (which we all need), the other required Schedule11 items (e.g.rapid depressurization), and LOFT exercises to extend our professional expertise. These reports should simply say "completed" or "not completed" but could provide an opportunity for the instructor to comment positively on a good performance.
De-personalized data could be retained to identify areas that might need more emphasis in refresher training.
Unfortunately I suspect that management at the higher levels is unlikely to move in this direction.