PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - It's good someone was awake.
View Single Post
Old 25th Dec 2009, 00:09
  #3 (permalink)  
Checkerboard
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noticed in the last ammendment in the ATC section of Jepps it now states that any request for a non standard level has to include the phrase "due to operational requirement".
I would not consider winds or travelling closer to optimum level an operational requirement unless fuel critical. Maybe ATC needs to be less generous with non standard level approvals unless pilots start using this phrase and they have a genuine need for a non standard level.
Checkerboard is offline