Corect....
411A is correct. Gosh, you must be a Microsoft-trained pilot, too!
(I now feel in good company.....)
Question: Is the runway they landed on, the runway on which most landings are made at that airport? If so, when was the last time the rubber was cleaned off the runway?
Question: Was the runway they landed on just wet or contaminated?
Question: What was the condition of the other end of the runway....
rubber deposits....water depth?
Question: Was the tailwind component (the actual tailwind component) what was reported, or was it greater than reported?
Question: Was the wind gusting? That is to ask, was the touchdown speed higher than Vref?
Question: Did the runway have standard grooving? Non-standard grooving? When was that cleaned?
Question: Did the crew fly the aircraft perfectly? Did they land exactly on speed, exactly at the proper touchdown point?
Question: What was the condition of the tires? Where the treads worn? When was the last tire pressure check?
Question: Did the speed brake auto-deploy correctly? Or, did the crew make a 'greaser' landing on a 'floating' runway, and have to pull the speed brake themselves?
Question: Did the spool up time for the engines into thrust reverse occur promptly? Or, was there a second or two delay, as there sometimes is?
Question: Did the anti-skid system work properly?
Question: Did the aircraft weigh more than the load sheet stated? During Christmas, many times the overhead bins are so full of XXXX, the plane surely weighs at least 1000 lbs more.
Question: According to 'the charts', would the aircraft have enough runway to land considering: contaminated runway, rubber-coated runway ends, higher-than-reported aircraft weight, higher than Vref touchdown speed, etc., etc. (You get the idea.)
These are all questions on the ATP exam of the Microsoft Simulator disk....
Just retired, after 37 years of incident-free, accident-free, violation-free flying....hell, I never realized how incompetent I truly am....
(OK, I'm ready for more insults!!!!)
Fly safe,
PantLoad