He's probably busy having his arse reamed out for writing stupid things in newsletters.
As pointed out by a captain that I know, if any of the sacked 49ers had little or no sickness in the previous 30 months, then has he committed another act of defamation? Hence instead of "stupid", Peter613 maybe should have said "defamatory"
Further, I believe the agreement for those guys who gave away their "right to sue" for the re-employment interview only encompassed legal action for unfair dismissal, not defamation, especially since this potential defamatory statement was made subsequent to the signing of that agreement.