If, in fact the judge is flying BA in the near future and only found in BAs favour to keep her flight flying, then why dosen't BASSA/UNITE appeal??
If she found for BA due to a conflict of interest and then failed to disqualify herself, or failed to get agreement from BOTH parties that she was fit to hear the case BASSA/UNITE have a valid reason to get the ruling overturned.
Why the whisper campaign, text messages and conspiracy theories. Facts are Facts, test them in a court of law. Stop spreading rumours like a bunch of 7 year olds in the play ground.
It could also be fact that BASSA/UNITE are casting libelous and unfounded rumours for thier own purpose. No doubt if the judge does feel she had been wronged by these comments, the not very anoymous members of CF will find themselves are the wrong end of a lawsuit.
BA won an an injuction and the strike is off.. Deal with it.. Move on. You have another chance to ballot and BASSA/UNITE and BA have a chance to negotiate.
If BOTH sides are reasonable and have adult discussions, there is no reason this cannot be resolved. No preconditions.
CB
PS is anyone else totally flabergasted at BASSA/UNITES demand for £400,000 per week, rather than re-instating the crewing levels?!?! I though a crew off was a saftey issue?!?!? Obviously one that can be resolved with a supply of cold hard cash. Also what part of BAs requirement to save £140m does an extra payment of £400k per week satisfy... What planet are these guys from?