If the company took the 2.6% ( I don't remember the actual percentage now but it was more than 2) x 14.000 of us, long b4 the 16th of Nov. The savings would have been farther greater than they are now. Wouldn't you agree?
(a) The savings were only temporary.
(b) They were not worth the 140m BA needed, but added up (with the others suggested by BASSA) to just over a third of what was required.
How could I agree when your numbers do not add up?
Added: Remember BASSA could have looked at the accounts and seen exactly where the company stood, had they accepted the (fair) conditions regarding protecting that valuable, confidential information.