You say potato, I say pro and anti union aside, has easy lost its way or is it at a crossroads where it could lose its way?
Is easy a low cost, low fare airline or is it another bmi?
Trying to be a low service, no frills "legacy" carrier to major airports and dip toes in many sectors without excelling at any one thing? As a result in danger of alienating the very customers it relies on for its lifeblood. Even the easy website is a nightmare to work through in comparison to the FR site.
Flying a mixed fleet, as opposed to one type ( OK the 320 and 321 share a common TR but it doesn't make crew training or reservations any simpler) and not focusing a la Southwest on secondary airports - faster turn round, fewer delays.
Was, is the Airbus the correct choice for a loco - needs steps, baggage loaders etc?
I'm not stirring just opening up the debate on the comparison with the FR model.