Slim
You are PROUD of a union that facilitates the exploitation of CTC cadets at easy?
The very fact that these cadets did not / do not have BALPA representation at easyJet, due mainly to being contracted to CTC rather than easyJet, means they do not come under the protection of BALPA-negotiated agreements and as such are open to the exploitation you mention.
Surely this means there is all the more reason to
have union representation, so they can be treated the same as the rest of the workforce?! If they did, then they might have fared better. I know. I was there last year.
You have posts advocating Ryanair's approach to industrial relations (i.e. involving Brookfield contracts), and in the same thread you attack BALPA's 'allowing' easyJet's 'exploitation' of CTC cadets, many of whom are now working on FlexiCrew terms, which is turning out to be more or less a mirror of... er, Brookfield. And you accuse others of myopia...!