PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - IMC: 'Hung out to dry by our own side'
View Single Post
Old 7th December 2009 | 14:30
  #143 (permalink)  
BEagle
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,399
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
No, the so-called 'accessible IR' is a different issue. I am talking purely about the IMC rating.

People should STOP saying what is or isn't 'ever going to be acceptable in the rest of Europe' - the question is more basic. Do you or don't you want something in Europe which gives identical privileges to the UK IMC rating - which you can use where the airspace authorities allow?

Incidentally, I hear that there is considerable resistance to the 'accessible IR' from airline pilot unions - they want less spamcans in 'their' airspace, it seems. Having listened to the stumbling incompetence of a 'continental' PPL/IR holder trying to fly an approach at Bournemouth once, I do see that they may have a point.

The Australian PIFR developed from the original Australian 'EIR' proposals and now include Flight Procedure Approvals (e.g. instrument approach procedures) after completion of additional training and testing requirements......
BEagle is offline  
Reply