What would you propose and why?
I would propose:
* that those who wish to fly IFR should get an instrument rating
* that the training requirements for the IR should be proportionate to the real needs of instrument flying (as apparently proposed by FCL.008) rather than being needlessly costly and time-consuming
* that the standards for IFR flying should remain single tier and universal
* that any sub-ICAO instrument qualification is considered not as an end in itself but as a stepping stone to an IR, in the same way that student solo flight is considered a stepping stone to a PPL (or CPL/ATPL).
On the last point, I remain encouraged that such a stepping stone is possible, but I don't feel too attached to the idea that it has to be the Enroute IR that FCL.008 has discussed. I have not, however, seen a proposal that convincingly balances privileges and training of any such sub-ICAO rating.