Raewald said,
"Incidentally, I was hoping that someone might comment on my possibly contradictory suggestion that you can be tolerable and not ALARP and still acceptable during the period when it is reasonable to allow newly determined ALARP measures to be introduced."
That's what I was eluding to in post 95 - In some circumstances, on discovering an acceptably tolerable fault, the movement towards ALARP can be via a managed recovery process. Subject of course to reliability and safety management processes.
Reading these latest posts:
How often can important documents be ignored/deleted because of unimportant mistakes?
I know I'm no Legal beagle, I tend to read the words and not between the lines, but you guys now seem to be pointing out the "spelling mistakes" and missing the whole point of the H-C Review?