Who is getting mad?
No one as far as I can see is 'trying to hang on to the Status Quo', rather arguning that where change is desirable, that change that actually 'improves safety and efficiency' be considered.
The reversals, in all cases, have come because there are people with a fundamentalist view who do not understand science.
Yes, sadly much money has been wasted on flawed change process. You would think political and agency masters would recongise
the problem after the first few attempts!
In other countries the airspace reforms have been made after there are accidents.
Thats what happens when monitoring and change processes are 'dicked around'.
I reckon it would be a good idea to look at these accidents in other countries and then make changes here before they happen
Agree. What is your take on Class E [below A100] accidents and incidents in the US?
probably wishful thinking when there are so many people in Australian aviation who are totally opposed to looking at what happens overseas or, indeed, anywhere else.
Totally opposed? No, smart enough to recognise when a square peg is being unsucessfully rammed into round hole!