I am not quite sure why AOPA UK and the CAA are supporting the IMCr if they are so clearly out of tune with the rest of Europe. I do hope they are not simply playing politics.
Fuji
I dont really understand what "supporting the IMCR" means. That sounds a bit like save the whale. ie it is something in a distinct shape or form which needs saving.
By save the IMCR are we suggesting in its present UK form for that is what the IMCR is? If thats the case forget it as it will never happen.
The best we will get is a very watered down version of the IMCR which is there in name only.
The danger with that is that it will deflect from getting a more easely achievable instrument rating for the PPL as EASA will make a empty gesture tell us that we now have an IMCR and then forget an achievable European PPL IR.
In my mind the best route forward would be for a modular IR ie a junior version for below RVSM airspace with maybe allowances for experienced pilots to apply for a pre test test. If that is passed then you can take the full examiner IR flight test.
On the exam side a cut down version more designed towards the PPL and able to be completed in a full time 2-3 week course.
That IR could then be added to for Commercial ATP Privalages.
In my mind that is what we should be focusing on and not chasing something that will not happen.
Pace