PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Overweight Landing and Field Length
View Single Post
Old 15th Nov 2009, 01:48
  #33 (permalink)  
Intruder
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
-------------
To Intruder
-------------
Thankyou for your response. Regarding the extra details you want to know:

- Departure airport is the only option.

- The factored landing distance equals the runway length at Max Landing Weight.

- Why 1.67 % is used? It's a dispatch safety figure for landing and thats what the discussion is all about that, "Can it be used once the A/C is airborne?"

- Unfactored landing distance of 5700 feet which I mentioned in the example is with operational reversers and autobrakes.

So with this extra info do you still hold your answer of Landing and not waiting? Thanx.
I do not normally consider Dispatch safety factors once airborne. The exception is fo a planned redispatch, where Dispatch rules still apply.

I have seen 15% and 40% runway length factors usded in various scenarios. This is the first time I have seen 67% used.

If the 5700' landing distance includes air distance to touchdown point and uses normal (not max) autobrakes, I would still consider landing. I would still check the emergency max landing weight for the airport and compare that to the TO (or current) weight. That will give another indication of relative performance limitations.
Intruder is offline