So then absence of approval can be perceived to be non-support?
Questions of whether mission reassignments were the right decision should now be posed to the MH-53 and CV-22 drivers that have gone through the transition to gauge whether or not wise decisions were made in the past (for instance, you might ask mckpave who had 12 years in the MH-53 before moving to the CV-22)? It is understandable that there would be apprehension to mission reassignments in the early stages of any transition.