The prospect of mcuh of so called insurance protection bieng invalid is insteresting / disturbing / worrying.
If the case come from FL then I'n obviously not in a position to argue - but I wonder where that leaves things in terms of the Unfair Contract Terms Act?
If a blanket clause is being used to avoid liability by the insurance company would it not be possible to challenge it under the terms of this act if the discrepancy is not causal in the accident.
Otherwise aircraft insurance is almost worthless - any multipart flight - out and back for instance would mean the logbooks would not be 'up to date' - unless they were filled in after every stop - a somewhat unusual practice....