Originally Posted by
Olive oil
Well , that's your opinion. Now that you are back, are you just kicking over the embers of this long-burned-out thread, or do you have something in the way of an overwhelming argument that might persuade away from the negligence/cfit conclusion?
Olive,
I know it's simply going over old ground but if you would allow me to spin your post around a bit have you found new evidence that proves without a single shadow of a doubt that the verdict in this case is safe.
Forget your own opinion just for a second as opinion counts for zip, have you the missing piece that proves once and for all what
exactly , not
probably happened?
If you have then please share it with us, if not then please join the rest of us in wondering what actually happened and why on that day.