The question that needs to be asked is: "What kind of airfield wildlife management program is in place at DUS"? A well structured program should have prevented this type of event.
As pilots we need to remember that strikes with flocking birds represent the greates hazard. Yes, large waterfowl represent the highest risk, but small birds can be just as hazardous. The worst aviation accident from a bird strike was caused by a flock of starlings.
Sadly many segments of our industry feel that bird strikes are "natural" events that cannot be prevented, which is not true. Additionally, there is a desire for "silver bullet" solutions to managing wildlife and there aren't any. Managing wildlife to reduce strike risks is like guerilla warfare - you need to know your enemy and be aware that his tactics will evolve constantly. A good wildlife control program requires an integrated approach to manage habitat and use active control.
Recent events are confirming that bird strikes are a significant risk to flight safety, that is occurring with increasing regularity, that needs better management. We have had two hull losses, fortunately with no loss of life. The next major bird strike hull loss event, which will occur in the near future, may not result in such successful outcomes. As an industry we cannot afford to have this type of preventable event. When one of these events does occur the resulting investigations will show that prevention is possible and there will be significant liability costs assessed against the parties who should have acted to prevent the event.
There are lots of great resources out there to help all parts of our industry manage bird strike risks. Take the time to learn more!