PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - New airspace: Dick Smith
View Single Post
Old 7th Jun 2002, 07:31
  #129 (permalink)  
Creampuff
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 3,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dr Mr Smith

I note and thank you for your answer "no". Given that answer, it is reasonable for me to conclude that you are not convinced the NAS model will be at least as safe or safer than the LAMP model and the existing airspace model, and nor are you convinced the NAS model will be cheaper than the LAMP model and the existing airspace model.

You ask whether a statement you attribute to me is an example of my knowledge and accuracy. That metaphor about a pot and a kettle springs to mind. I suggest you double-check the provenance of that statement. (Don’t worry – we all make mistakes.)

But let me address the ‘control zone by NOTAM’ matter, head on. The fact that the holders of delegations to declare Romeo and Danger Areas might purport to exercise those delegations in such a way as to create a pretend control zone, merely begs the question. It may well be that those declarations are not authorised by the PRD-making power: someone may well be planting road signs they have no power to plant.
Creampuff is offline