When a flying school goes bankrupt it inevitably offends some of it's customers and this in turn stays in people's minds for a long time.
When a new firm comes along, it should be viewed on merit. However if there any connections (such as the people engaged) between the bankrupt organisation and the new organisation, then people will naturally be wary. If the new organisation has very high profile advertising, which is rather less than transparent, it will make customers very wary indeed.
This very public display of rather pathetic in-fighting suggets left-over connections somewhere, and can do little to enhance anyone's view of GA.
Let alone what a regulator might make of it !
