PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Mach Tuck Concern Unjustified ? Help me Understand & I'll pass it on !
Old 12th September 2009 | 14:03
  #17 (permalink)  
LeadSled
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,960
Likes: 17
From: Australia
Folks,

I've flown every variant of the 707, except the RR Conway powered -300, and the QF 707-138 (not a -120, as many seem to think) and every one featured Mach trim.

The biggest variable I found between them all was the yaw stability, ie; the propensity to dutch roll, followed by the pitch/speed stability on approach, the -320s could be very touchy.

Some strange modifications insisted on by the UK ARB didn't do anything to help the G- registered, although the late D.P Davies would disagree --- but he didn't have to fly them in the real world.

Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Reply