PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Chinook - Still Hitting Back 3 (Merged)
View Single Post
Old 27th Aug 2009, 14:37
  #5619 (permalink)  
tucumseh
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,226
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
JP

May I ask why you are interested, having apparently "retired" from the thread?

It's just that you either ignore or deride my posts, thereby showing complete disinterest in airworthiness; in fact, much like a few 2 Stars and above I have quoted, including various Mins(AF); the last of whom is now our esteemed Secretary of State.

If Mr Haddon-Cave expands his interest beyond Nimrod (on which aircraft the MoD acknowledged a lack of airworthiness, so evidence was only needed as to the extent of the problem, which MoD had tried to hide) he need look no further than CDP's statements on Chinook and the evidence placed before the BoI, House of Lords and House of Commons which revealed precisely the same abrogation of duty of care and gross negligence, through failing to implement the mandated airworthiness regulations.


Having said this, it would indeed be nice if your sudden interest is as a result of you now recognising the sheer weight of evidence against MoD, in which case I'd be happy to discuss the detail with you.
tucumseh is offline