Its worthy of note that, despite JUPOs condescending suggestions about the consultation document and the ability of councils and other professional bodies to understand it, the majority of such organisations have asked for further information or even a presentation and then put in their "support" or "no comment" vote.
This comment really concerns me - coming as it does from someone who seems to fully support the application. Inspite of many of the statments in the 'consultation' document being known to frankly be lies, the poster seems to be gloating over having fooled these bodies. They will have decided on the basis of the 'evidence' presented in the document. 'Evidence' which owes an adful lot to the Alan Partridge school of analytical thought.