Paul,
My reference to sycophants was aimed at those other gentlemen on this forum, Capt. Bloggs and The Bolter, who, as with yourself, prefer to remain isolated behind the cloak of anonymity.
Sycophant indeed. I object to being called that simply because I choose to post "behind the clock of anonymity". Actually, now that you mention it, looking at the exact definition of the word, a person mentioned in this debate could attract that label. You really
do have an axe to grind if you can only "attack the man" and not his argument.
So we get back to the conflict of interest issue. Simply put, in respect of the two organisations, there cannot be one.
Oh yes there can be... You just cannot see it.