PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Climb gradient after engine failure
View Single Post
Old 21st August 2009 | 18:03
  #1 (permalink)  
AeroTech
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 2
From: USA
Climb gradient after engine failure

Hi,

I am not familiar with these stuffs, I hope these questions don't seem stupid.

a)Are climb gradient requirements for aircraft certification or requirements that an operator should comply? or both?

b)Where these numbers (2.4%, 2.7%, 3.0%, …) came from? : Are these empirical numbers or just as a consensus or decision made by certain aviation authorities or administrations (like FAA, ICAO,…)?
Just to make it clear: for example why the climb gradient for the second segment is 2.4% and not 1.2% (twin) or for example why the second segment is usually the most limiting than the third or the fourth?

c) If a turn is required after engine failure during takeoff, does this affect aircraft performance (more/less altitude loss than usual or small/big radius than usual?) depending on the turn into the inoperative engine or into the operative engine (assume it is a twin)?

Feedback appreciated
Regards
AeroTech is offline  
Reply