.
I would have thought October decision at the earliest, and longer/indefinite if one or other chooses to delay or take more soundings. Anyone got anything more definite?
A response is not expected until early 2010 at the very earliest
I have seen that one coming.
"Papa Kilo squawk ****"
"Negative squawk, Papa Kilo"
"Roger, negative service remain clear...."
Although Lakenheath can handle us without a transponder, I bet you Norwich wont. Mind you, by the time the class D is established it will be mandatory anyway.
Complete nonsense and utter crap, a transponder is not mandatory and won't be for a long time.
The LAA have put forward a very good response, which includes this statement
From what I've read, it appears that the LAA have failed to be completely objective and consequently, it appears that many of their members have forwarded objections based on what the LAA have published rather than checking the facts, their loss as dramatic statements of no consequence count for nothing.
From what I understand, many objections have been made on conjecture, not fact and if that is the case it's a shame because not only will those objections not count for much, the LAA, who appear to have encouraged them, will look pretty daft.