It also saves significant dollars that at the end of the day contribute to the financial health of the airline - something we all need to ensure we have a job.
Rumour has it that Boeing are looking at using reverse thrust (737NG) for backing out of airbridge positions rather than using tugs to push back. The cost savings is significant by eliminating need for tug drivers (saving in union driven high salaries, overtime, and other workers benefits) Single engine reverse is being considered to save fuel but the extra thrust means higher fuel consumption so at this stage two engine reverse appears the go. One company is known to be looking into the possibility of employing deaf and dumb marshallers or wing tip walkers during the push back process. This offers considerable savings on radio headsets now used during push back. Sign language manuals will be issued to flight crew.
Amazing what operational measures can be taken to contribute to the financial health of the airline - something we all need to ensure we have a job...
