I beg to differ, Noggin. Originally all initial issues and renewals were to require a Skill Test, revalidations (other than by expereince) required a Proficiency Check. Easy enough to understand - but then someone in the CAA confused everyone by declaring that 'demonstration of skill by flying a Proficiency Check would be acceptable to the Authority for rating renewal purposes' or words to that effect. Immediately all your - oops, I mean their, good work on the roadshows was put into doubt. The LST/LPC forms are a nightmare and require revision, but as for that ridiculous SRG\1119......
The revised form should start with personal details, test/check details and declaration. Then it should be sectioned so that mandatory items common to all are listed, then increasingly specific requirements for such as ME type ratings etc. Then the simple SEP reval could be pp1-2, MEP pp1-3, 747-400 Type Rating pp1-8 or whatever.
Oh - and K.I.S.S!!