Originally Posted by wk
and it seems reasonable to assume (as Boeing's dist/time analysis has it
- problem with your scenario, WK, is that you are taking 'guesswork' for point of waypoint change as fact - "
reasonable to assume ". We do not know where they were at waypoint change. Any TANS memory is only reading TANS position. Is it 'reasonable'? We are told that TANS cannot be relied on after a sea crossing.
Like so many, you are reading fact into supposition.