Once again, the BRU accident proved this quite conclusively.
If you mean that the EBBR incident proved that you're going by ancient misguided information and that you don't know what it is you're talking about, then perhaps so...but an aircraft didnt' need to be lost to prove that.
The actions of one man do not a company make, and his actions are most certainly not what is taught by the company, nor is the company lax in it's teaching and application of the rejected takeoff in training. Further, it's not what the captain himself briefed.
Really you have no solid ground on which to stand, save for has-been memories of something you know not. Perhaps if your experiences were recent in any way, shape or form, and you were not living in the past, your commentary might have some relevancy. Alas, it does not.