Outrageous and Libellous
This coming from a man who has accused dead aircrew, with no ability to defend themselves of:
1. Not eating breakfast. Wrong.
2. Inadequate planning. Unproven.
3. Planning to exceed crew duty. Unproven.
3. Listening to music to the detriment of their duties. Wrong.
If the crew were my family, I know who I would have in court.
Now lets take a look at the RO's and there Staffs.
1. They selected the BOI.
2. They "manipulated", the choice of witnesses.
( You have said yourself CAZ, that they decided on the relevance of evidence.)
3.. When the BOI failed to find the required verdict, they reversed the decision. They based this decision on flawed computer simulations.
4. They presented these simulations to HOL as "Facts." Since they clearly knew they were not facts, that was dishonest.
In any other court in the land such manipulation would be regarded as:
"Perverting the Couse of Justice."
The mehods used by the AM,s to obtain their verdict would fit in perfectly in Iran or North Korea, but has no place in this country.
So sue me.