JP,
The Burke evidence was never considered by the Board or the RO's.
"If" they had considered this evidence and then accepted or rejected it, my continued insistance on raising the issue would indeed be circular.
Since they, and you insist on ignoring this evidence, it is not.
I do not remember in this thread anyone stating that the Author of AP3207, rejected CAZ's interpretation on "Burden of Proof." Again, a new statement.
Question still stands to you and Caz. Answer it, or admit you have no "reasoned" reply.