Having stated this
100% AirNZ, given that there was nothing wrong with the aircraft.
As for apportioning blame between the various AirNZ employees:
AirNZ Flight Ops and Nav sections: 60%
Capt Collins: 30%
F/O Cassin: 8%
F/O Lucas: 2%
F/Es Brooks and Maloney: 0%
How can you say
A bad case of pilot error
which inferred to me you thought the pilots were 100% to blame. However I now understand that you think the pilots were only partially to blame which is a concept that most might agree with.
Now why wont you answer my other question?
Can you honestly say, given the events that preceded this crash, you might not have ended up in the same situation?