cazatou, my thanks for your reply (5118) to my post (5115). You are correct; I was unaware that, formally, the AOC is part of the BoI.
However, is it not then the responsibility of either the current head of 1 Group (or its successor organisation), or his current superior to reconvene the Board if required?
If the original BoI personnel (those still serving at any rate) are to be reconvened, would it not be to the current AOC that they should answer? Are you somehow implying that if the then junior members of the BoI were to reconvene, that they would be acting improperly if they returned a verdict other than that decided by the AOC in 1994, even though that would mean reversing their own decision at the time?
Please bear in mind that a new BoI would not be a trial of the former AOC or AOCinC, but merely a reassessment of the evidence.
Last edited by CarltonBrowne the FO; 7th Jul 2009 at 10:23.