So are the previous statements about bodies being "unclothed" and all exhibiting "typical flail injuries" normally associated with meeting the high speed airflow of airframe breakup, now being discounted? Surely post mortem examination of bodies is the most precise evidence available in this case. It should be possible to clearly establish whether a body was ejected into a high speed airflow and then fell at terminal velocity till it hit the sea...As opposed to a body that was inside an aircraft that struck the sea.