humans v machine automation
Echoing SC, isn't the question settled in principle and now the only room for consideration relates to how to reduce the v. small residual risk even further, ie when human intervention is still needed (software goes for a walk, equipment failures, bad weather right in front of you ?). Tailored training, (even) better i/f !, better sims, ops margins ?
Even if it is not agreed, isn't it how the issue will be presented/managed ?