Originally Posted by
Orangputi
I respect anyones opinion. However, I am yet to get a response on how QF inflight service is better than some of the carriers mentioned. Furthermore, a response about how the pax's are treated by the boilers and ladyboys.
You really are kidding yourself Orangputi.
You will get no argument from me that SQ have more routes, more frequency to Aussie destinations, but that's about the end of the advantage, apart from girls wearing a kabaya.
The QF business product is as good if not better than SQ business.
(
see Taildragger67 post #260)
Your comment about SQ economy being as good as QF business is ridiculous.
Try it down the back in economy on a 747 on SQ and check out the the IFE that is almost 10 years.
There is no more leg room than anyone else and the food is nothing special.
You seem to have this problem with boilers and ladyboys.
Now if the boilers and ladyboys are providing bad service then your comment is valid, but I doubt it.
You cannot rate an airline and make a decision whether to fly with them based on the attractiveness of the crew.
If you do then you really are the loser.
I suspect you prefer SQ because the SQ crew don't stop serving you alcohol when you are pissed and start disturbing others in the cabin.
(This comment seems to apply to Stationair8 as well)