What a great place for journalists to research - on an anonymous forum with the following at the bottom:
As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.
*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".
Damaging an already damaged image of journalists by writing answers based on information given to you by somebody you've never met, and probably never will: nor do you know who they are.
Silly if you ask me.
