This still looks very suspicious to me - there are several formatting issues with the report (in other words this
PR differs from all others in a few ways compared to all other NTSB PRs), and the fact this is dated 6/25/2009 and still not listed on the NTSB website does not make sense.
For now I'd regard this as suspicious. And just because a few local newspapers pick up on it does NOT make it official. Viral email fakes are easy to produce. Does anyone have the purported email - can you publish the full email header? This will almost certainly prove the source one way or another.
- GY