DFC, don't you think it somewhat unwise to be engaging in such speculation? Or even to be willing to do so?
You appear to me to be off on a long line of deductive reasoning in which all you show is (a) your ignorance of facts, (b) a willingness to speculate on very little, and (c) a willingness to betray your personal inclinations and biases.
What good does that do anybody, much less somebody who seems to value their own insights to a high degree? It is indeed true to say
Quote:
It is not unfair if safety was indeed jeopardised.
But what does stating this truism add? I can assert with 100% confidence that you Sir are subject to the law of the land and the laws of gravity wherever you are. So there, that's told you!
What does not appear in your speculations is the possibility that a management team with a well-deserved reputation for misbehaviour may have done something wrong, improper or possibly even illegal. Why so?
Boy, a very concise summation of this posters actions/opinions on this thread, and if you care to check back - most other threads that he/she gets involved with.
Specifically, IAA ATCOs had a similar experience last year during an ongoing dispute, trying to offer information to DFC in reply to their questions, but finding out that we were just feeding a troll.
We found that by ignoring or failing to engage, that DFC
off to annoy someone else in the PPRUNE community.
Its just this threads turn!