Could you enlighten us as to exactly what charge in the list of "gross misconduct" offences he was found to be guilty of ?
I assume if he is out the door that is what is being intimated, can't imagine they left themselves so wide open as to dismiss him with some vague accusation outside the scope of the company regs, even if the "charge" is
a little tenous.
Oh dear, and after the`concillatory post directed at Leo I made on the other thread just 10 min ago . . . . . I sense a storm much worse than AF447 suffered brewing. . . . . batten down the hatches.
How horribly unnecessary, predictable, and unfortunately , entirely in character, this whole affair is playing out.
Uh Ah /
