Haven't said this for some time but as they say "here goes - again."
Doubt, any doubt, is a doubt if it cannot be proved to be otherwise.
THAT - is exactly what happened in this case. Day and Rotten were guilty of making the issue something that was cut and dried when it wasn't. In my book they were both negligent and showed dereliction of duty in not following the requirement, at that time in Queen's regs, that there must be "no doubt whatsoever" that the pilots were negligent.
They did not do that! The HoL committee hearing, which I attended, agreed with that and thus the pilots SHOULD have been exonerated forthwith.
A gross mis-carriage of justice was SEEN to be done following that hearing and it was, therefore, the duty of the MoD to reverse the decision of the AM's immediately.
So why are we still fighting?
BEagle has a letter from David Cameron, which states that if and when they return to power he, DC, WILL reverse it. Can't wait.