Jetdoc;
I think what you have got there is the AMM references for the maintenance of those components, not fault codes.
Thanks - its very possible - the document is ancient and very difficult to navigate within - finding fault-failure codes is difficult - also I'm unaccustomed to using the document. The point of course is to convey complexity - these may not be the fault codes so that argument appears compromised somewhat until one understands that this applies to all systems including fault/failure analysis; I strongly suspect there are "more numbers" which may or may not be available and which will further determine which sensors were providing "bad" data. I appreciate the comment, and hope others pick it up as well.