PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Technical Alternatives for Pitot Tubes?
View Single Post
Old 11th June 2009 | 11:12
  #43 (permalink)  
ampclamp
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 31
From: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Falconer,
in short is the 'kiss' principle a good idea?
many would say yes of course.others would disagree.In the end one can only judge by failure rates.
Whats more reliable, a s/w, a few relays, current sensors and a probe versus a clever box some wire s/w and a probe.
Done a bit of time on buses and I have changed a few PHC's.
I'd say more PHC's than failed probes on that type.
Most probes I've changed were the result of physical damage or altitude splits (in combo pitot /static probes as used on older 737 and 767 etc.)That is anecdotal evidence, you'd need to collate quite a history to have any scienctific conclusions drawn.

I'll leave any design critique to others that are more informed of the guts of the boxes in control. Been a while since I was on type and my notes are stashed somewhere.
ampclamp is offline  
Reply