PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Chinook - Still Hitting Back 3 (Merged)
View Single Post
Old 9th Jun 2009, 14:52
  #4718 (permalink)  
Sand4Gold
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 119K East of SARDOT
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A play on words.....

The ROs were fully aware of the standard of proof required iaw the guidance contained within AP3207, and in consultation with the incumbent Director of Legal Services (RAF). However, the guidelines were not worded to state that Day/Wratten had to establish causal facts to find Jon and Rich grossly negligent. All the ROs had to satisfy was that they had to be in no doubt whatsoever regarding the finding of gross negligence.

i.e. (in Jon's case) Day concluded that Jon was negligent to a gross degree at or before the waypoint change - he didn't have to prove it, he just had to believe it.


AP3207 – RAF Manual of Flight Safety, Chapter 8, Appendix G, page 9 states "ONLY IN CASES IN WHICH THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER SHOULD DECEASED AIRCREW BE FOUND NEGLIGENT
AA
Sand4Gold is offline