JP,
I really thought this thread had finished discussing the weather over the hills some time ago, because of all those on-the-spot witnesses.
We may have finished discussing the weather
over the hills but your
theory depends on the weather seen from the cockpit. You have consistently refused to remove the doubt about this. All you seem to be able to do now is ridicule all other
theories by putting them in the "flies in the cockpit" category. That really is an act of desperation.
So tell us, in what category do you put the evidence given to the HoL by Sq Ldr Burke? I realise that you think it is not relevant because, in your view, negligence occurred at waypoint change when they appeared to be under control. But, unless you can have no doubt about the view from the cockpit, you cannot ignore other possibilities.