Sorry about last nights entry (ies). It / they were made after too long a visit to Ye Horns Inn.
Cazatou in 4688 again draws our attention to the fact that the Reviewing Officers decision taken after receiving evidence under oath. He has also stated earlier he is not fully aware of all the evidence given by Sqn Ldr Burke to the HOL.
The impartial among you should now go back to 4675 by CHOCKS WAHAY, click on "this link", and read in toto.
The evidence of Sqn Ldr Burke is illuminating. Please note that the HOL appear to accept his evidence in toto.
Now read on to the evidence of the AM's. In para 135 the HOL reject five key "facts" in the AM's evidence. "In fact", Sir John himself, "under oath", accepts that one of his "key facts", the lack of selection of emergency power is not a "fact" at all.
Read para 108. The HOL comment on the submission of Gp Capt Pullford's, explaining the reasons for the exclusion of Sqn Ldr Burke from from the original BOI. They found his reasoning "unconvincing".