Chinook - Still Hitting Back 3 (Merged)

[Tandemrotor]

I appreciate the conjecture (based on 'back of a fag packet' circumstantial evidence) surrounding the weather, and of course the reasons some would wish it to be accepted as a 'factual' allegation, regarding the conduct of this specific flight.

Would some kind soul point me in the direction of the evidence that proves (conclusively) the crew 'broke' the weather limits for flight in accordance with VFR?

And particularly so prior to waypoint change, since some contend THIS is where negligence occurred.

I encourage you to state what 'standard' of proof your evidence satisfies: (you can choose 'balance of probability', 'beyond reasonable doubt', or the standard required in this case of 'absolutely no doubt whatsoever')

That way we can move on.

I'm obliged